Document Type : Research Paper

Authors

1 Al-Batool Teaching Hospital for Obstetrics and Gynecology, Mosul

2 Al Hadbaa Primary Health Care Center, Mosul, Iraq.

Abstract

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) build up guidelines for the integrated management of childhood illnesses (IMCI) in the health facilities  to improve the recognition and the individual management of the common reasons of death among children under the age of five. The approach used in outpatient clinical settings with restricted diagnostic and therapeutic tools.
Aim of study: To assess the impact of implementation of IMCI strategy, in reducing an inappropriate prescription of antibiotics and raising vaccination coverage.     
Patients and methods: A cross-sectional study design was arranged, where 395 child with age from two months up to below 5 years old attending Al Hadbaa PHCC from 1st of January to 31st of March 2014 suffering from one or more of the following respiratory infection, diarrheal diseases, throat infections, ear infections and fever. The children assessed separately by two clinics, "A" non-adopting IMCI and "B" adopting IMCI guidelines, the Mc-Nemar test was applied and differences  were evaluated.
Results: The attendant children are 239 males and 156 females complaining from fever (39.1%), throat problems (21.4%), ear problems (12.6%), cough (11.6%), diarrhea (11.1%) and pneumonia (4.2%). The overall use of antibiotics is 66.1% in clinic "A" and 21.0% in clinic "B" with p-value 0.000. Regarding the immunization, the outcomes appear to have very high significant difference  54.1% in "A" and 75.7% in "B".
Conclusion: The classification-approach to the sick child using IMCI guidelines has clear effect on decreasing an inappropriate use of antibiotics and raising number of vaccinated children, which justifying the adaptation of this strategy.   

Keywords

Main Subjects

INTRODUCTION

 

 

A

lmost 11 million of children below the age of five years living in the developing countries die every year, the death occurs in 7 from every 10 of those result from the common illnesses affecting children as acute respiratory infections (ARI), diarrhea, dehydration, measles, and malaria. All these illnesses are both  preventable and easily treatable. Malnutrition complicates half of these cases.1-3

   World Health Organization (WHO) developed the Integrated Management for Childhood Illnesses (IMCI) which is an integrated guidelines to assess child complain that focuses on the well-being status of the child. IMCI aims to relieve illness and/or disability with effort to minimize death, and to enhance growth and development among children below the age of five years. IMCI has preventive and curative fundamentals that are realized by families, communities and also by health facilities. The strategy of IMCI includes three core elements4:

  • Improving case management attitudes and skills of medical and paramedical staff
  • Advancing the health systems
  • Progressing the family and community health performance.

   In the health facilities, the precise identification of illnesses affecting children in outpatient settings has been promoted by IMCI strategy to ensure an appropriate combined treatment of all major illnesses, build up the counseling of caretakers, and accelerate the referral to the hospital of the severely sick attendant children. While when the setting was home, the suitable care inquire behaviors, enhanced nutrition and preventative care, and the accurate achievement of prescribed care, these were the targets of IMCI .3

  IMCI case management training provide the health workers with skills to deal with and manage children presented with a combination of illnesses, identify those requiring urgent referral, administer appropriate treatments (especially the antibiotics mainly amoxicillin, co-trimoxazole, erythromycin or i.m. penicillin or ceftriaxone vials), and provide relevant information to child care providers. IMCI implementation has been revealed the advancement in the quality of management of sick children.5-7 

   Case management strategy usually depends on the clinical presentation of diseases (syndromes) rather than on the etiologies. The IMCI checklist, should be filled during the interview with children and parents, all symptoms and signs were recorded systematically, then the classification(s) were outlined using series of algorithms and written according to IMCI chart booklets, next step was the identification of treatments.8

   The main reason physicians overprescribe antibiotics for an example RTIs relates to diagnostic uncertainty. Faced with an ill-appearing, febrile child and anxious parents, physicians are reluctant to offer only symptomatic therapy. If the physician were more certain that the infection was of a viral etiology, then a greater comfort level might exist in avoiding antibiotic therapy.9,10

   Conclusively, the vaccines are a cost-effective interference in the health system. Despite the little costs of vaccines, it provides enormous benefits for the health of populations. According to WHO records, the annual death among children below the age of 5 years reach 10.6 million; while an estimated 1.4 million of those are due to diseases that might prevented by vaccines.11

   Despite the huge benefit of the vaccinations, some people still not interested with vaccinations in terms of either not vaccinating at all, or not completing their vaccination programs.12

   In IMCI, vaccinations status been checked for every attending child. Any missed vaccines are given for children who do not have severe classifications.13 Moreover, IMCI trained health workers communicate better with the parents.5 Because being unaware of need for immunization, uninformed about the need to return for subsequent second or third dose, unknown place and/or time of immunization, the probable side effect, the incorrect thoughts about contraindications, lack of reliance in immunization, inconvenient time of vaccination, absence of well trained heath worker and vaccine, and long waiting time at health facility were reasons for not fully immunizing the children.14

 

Aim of study: To assess the impact of implementation of IMCI strategy in reducing inappropriate prescription of antibiotics and raising vaccination coverage. 

 

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Three hundred and ninety five child age from two months up to below five years old attending Al-Hadbaa Training Center for Family Medicine in Mosul,  were enrolled in this cross-sectional study.

After obtaining the administrative agreement from the Directorate of Health of Nineveh and the informed oral consent was taken from all parents, the sample collected  according to the inclusion criteria listed as follows :

  • children between two months and up to five years old.
  • Those children should presented with one or more of the following  respiratory infection (including throat infections and ear infections), diarrheal diseases, and fever.
  • First visit for the present complaint.
  • The attendant child must have no severe sickness that call for a referral.

The sample were interviewed by researchers for assessment and consent taken. Every child has been reviewed separately by 2 clinics; clinic "A" not adopting IMCI guidelines and clinic "B" implementing the strategy of IMCI guidelines, in which, IMCI̕s checklist paper filled for every child and the assessment started systematically including general danger sign, respiratory complaints, diarrhea, throat problems, ear problems, fever, state of growth and malnutrition, checking vaccination, assess feeding and finally to found out other problems. The collection of characteristic signs and symptoms for each illness leads to one classification or more, rather than to a specific diagnosis. Then guidelines include schemes and algorithms for  identifying treatment.

The data obtained from both clinics along the period from January to end of March 2014.The data were managed by using SPSS version 18. this software installed in a personal mini laptop. The Percentages, Mac-Nemar and p-value  were measured.

 

RESULTS

Figure 1 illustrates the distribution of study population according to sex and reveals that 239 of them are males and 156 are females representing 60.5% and 39.5% respectively.

   Figure 2 displays  the distribution of study population according to specific age intervals. Where 39% of them were between the age of 4 years to less than 5, while the interval 1-2 years was the lowest frequencies of 12%.

 

Figure 1: Distribution of study population according to sex. 

 

Figure 2: Distribution of study population according to age groups.

 

 

   Figure 3 shows the main complaints of children attending Al-Hadbaa Training Center in this study were shown in a descending manner starting from fever, throat problems, ear problems, cough, diarrhea and pneumonia representing 39.1%, 21.4%, 12.6%, 11.6%,  11.1% and 4.2% respectively.

   Table 1 portrays highly significant differences between clinic "A" and clinic "B" in all complaints with p-values=0.0000 in the all specific classifications which are 524 since that the child may presented with more than one complaint and classification.

   Table 2 shows a highly significant difference between the clinic "A" and clinic "B" in overall antibiotics prescription with p-value of 0.000, while the difference between the oral and injectable antibiotics in both clinics in ratios of  80.1%, 92.8%, 19.9% and 7.2% is just significant (p-value 0.017).

   The difference in asking about the vaccination status between both clinics is very highly significant with p-value=0.000 and ranging from 51.9% in clinic "A" to 100% in clinic "B", moreover a very highly significant difference is allocated between those who send to be vaccinated in each clinic 54.1% in clinic "A" and 75.7% in clinic "B" at p-value= 0.000, as shown in Table 3.

 

 

Figure 3: Distribution of study population according to complaints.

 

 

Table 1: The difference between clinic "A" and clinic "B" regarding the chief complaints.

Chief complaints

Clinic "A"

Clinic "B"

p-value

Fever

205 (39.1%)

205 (39.1%)

0.000

Throat problems

112 (21.4%)

74 (14.1%)

0.000

Diarrhea

58 (11.1%)

58 (11.1%)

0.000

Ear problems

66 (12.6%)

84 (16.0%)

0.000

Cough

61 (11.6%)

95 (18.1%)

0.000

Pneumonia

22 (4.2%)

8 (1.6%)

0.000

 

Table 2: The difference between clinic "A" and clinic "B" regarding the antibiotics prescription.

Antibiotics prescription

Clinic "A"

Clinic "B"

p-value

Overall antibiotics

261 (66.1%)

83 (21.0%)

0.000

Oral antibiotics

209 (80.1%)

77 (92.8%)

0.017

Injectable  antibiotics

52 (19.9%)

6 (7.2%)

 

Table 3: The difference between clinic "A" and clinic "B" regarding vaccination.

Vaccination related action

Clinic

A

Clinic

B

p-value

Those who ask about vaccines

205 (51.9%)

395 (100%)

0.000

Those who send to be vaccinated

111 (54.1%)

299 (75.7%)

0.000

 

 

 

DISCUSSION

This work shows that 60.5% from the attendant children were males and 39.5% females, most of them 39% were in the age 4-5 years, this may due to that the children in this older age interval start to skill the surroundings and being more predisposed and expose to pathogens. Fever presented as the most frequent symptom 39.1%, followed by throat problems, ear problems, cough, diarrhea and the least frequent one was pneumonia 4.2%. Similar results found in a study done in Syria, which involve 112 sick child, were found that 32% were in the 4-5 years age group and 10% within 1-2 years interval, moreover the major complains were: 73 fever, 37 pharyngitis, 35 diarrhea, 19 otitis media and 15 cough.15

   According to a recent survey on healthcare associated infections in Europe, 35.0% of children referred to hospital in 2011 were receiving antibiotics for their illness.16 Also in US, it was found that the health care workers prescribed 258.0 million course of antibiotics (833 prescriptions per 1000 persons) in 2010; Penicillins (23%) and macrolides (22%) were on the top of frequent categories prescribed.17

   In this current study, a significant difference in favor of adopting IMCI was clear regarding the antibiotics uses, were 6.1% of clinic "A" and 21.0% of clinic "B" out of 395 attending children receiving antibiotics as overall. In the same manner, an increasing rate of antibiotic prescription was observed in the cohort study involving children at out-patient settings in Papua New Guinean, with 54% of cases treated (including mild and severe cases) when a maximum of 36% should have received antibiotics according to IMCI criteria8. In Egypt 2011 with frequencies of 89.3%, 87.3%, 91.3%, and 91.3%, respectively than in the clinic not adopting16, and the injectable drugs were decided to be used in only 0.7% of cases in clinic "A" adopting IMCI, this may be a benefit of adopting IMCI because the cost of injection therapy is always higher than that of oral therapy, in the present work, the ratio of the injectable antibiotics from the total antibiotic prescription was also low in clinic "B" in comparison with clinic "A", this is run in a very high significant difference (p-value=0.034), this can be explained by the fact that the injectable antibiotics prescription in IMCI, has been conserved to the child with sever classifications who need urgent referral to hospital. The orally prescribed antibiotics to child in a study done in Egypt steering up from (10.3%) in non IMCI to (81.3%) in IMCI adapting unit.17

   Contrarily in several studies18-20, the results  showed low specificity of IMCI algorithms, especially to identify bacterial infections that require antibiotics this limitations in IMCI could be explained by the defect in the available diagnostic tools or lack the concerning about the local epidemiology. Therefore, many children might be given antibiotics  that is not required.

   According to IMCI guideline, checking the immunization status is very important. If a child should be immunized, the health worker gives immunizations even if child was sick under condition that the referral was rolled out, so every sick child can receive vaccination if the decision was to be treated at home.21 So in this study 17.5% of children attending clinic "A"   checked about their vaccinations in comparison with 100% in clinic "B", with a significant very high difference (p-value=0.000).

   Of those who checked in this work, 54.1% and 75.7% were sent to be vaccinated from clinic "A" and "B" respectively. The very highly significant difference could be due to the adherence and compliance to IMCI checklist, in which the care provider ticks in front the vaccines that previously taken by the child in previous visit and encircles the vaccines that the child should be taken at the current visit.

   A retrospective work in Egypt assessing the data from the years 2000 to 2006 compared the annual mortality rates under-five in 254 districts before starting the IMCI approach and after, the post-IMCI correctly checked child for immunization status was 94.3% against 18.6% pre-IMCI.17

 

CONCLUSION

The classification-approach to the sick child using IMCI guidelines has clear effect on decreasing an inappropriate use of antibiotics and raising number of vaccinated children, which justifying the adaptation of this strategy.   

 

RECOMMENDATIONS

To the best of our awareness, this the first study in Mosul to report the benefits of IMCI on the child health. The need for further studies to evaluate the other aspects of the IMCI is imperious and how will health workers comply with IMCI guidelines in routine practice must be tested and on the effect of IMCI recommendations on health outcomes.

1. World Health Organization, Department of Child and Adolescent Health and Development, The Multi-Country Evaluation of IMCI Effectiveness, Cost and Impact (MCE) Progress Report 2000- 2001. Available from :http ://apps .who. int /iris /bitstream /10665 /68457 /1/WHO _FCH _CAH _ 01 .15.pdf.
2. Sundar S, Madhukar R, Chakravarty J, Agrawal S. Prevention of Antibiotic resistance/ Antibiotic Misuse–Abuse. Medicine up date. 2005: 695-699. 
3. WHO and UNICEF. Integrated Management of Childhood Illness: A WHO/UNICEF initiative. Bulletin of the World Health Organization.1997; 75 (1): 7-24.
4. Jibo AM, Iliyasu Z, Abubakar IS, Umar LM and Hassan AM. Community-integrated management of childhood Illnesses (C-IMCI) and key household practices in Kano, Northwest Nigeria. Sub-Saharan Africa J Med 2014;1: 70-76. 
5. Bryce J, Gouws E, Adam T, Black RE, Schellenberg JA, Manzi F, et al. Improving quality and efficiency of facility-based child health care through Integrated Management of Childhood Illness in Tanzania. Health policy and planning. 2005; 9(1): 69-76. 
6. Amaral J, Gouws E, Bryce J, Leite AJ, Cunha AL, et al. Effect of Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) on health worker performance in Northeast-Brazil. Cad SaudePublica. 2004; 20 (l 2): 209-219. 
7. Arifeen S, Blum LS, Hoque DM, Chowdhury EK, Khan R, et al. Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) in Bangladesh: early findings from a cluster-randomized study. Lancet. 2004; 364:1595-1602.
8. Senn N, Rarau P,  Salib M,  Manong D,  Siba P, Rogerson S, et al. Use of Antibiotics within the IMCI Guidelines in Outpatient Settings in Papua New Guinean Children: An Observational and Effectiveness Study. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6): Published online 2014 March 13. doi: 10.1371 /journal. pone. 0090990.   
9. Bantar C, Sartori B, Eugenia M , Vesco E, Heft C, Saul M, Salamone F. A Hospital wide Intervention Program  to Optimize the Quality of Antibiotic  Use: Impact on Prescribing Practice, Antibiotic Consumption, Cost Savings, and Bacterial Resistance. Clinical Infectious Diseases. 2003; 37:180-186.
10. Pichichero ME. Understanding Antibiotic Overuse for Respiratory Tract Infections in Children. Pediatrics. 1999; 104;  1384. 
11. Masadeh M, Alzoubi K, Al-Azzam S,  Al-Agedi H,  Abu Rashid B, Mukattash T. Public awareness regarding children vaccination in Jordan. Human Vaccin Immunother. 2014 Jun 1; 10(6): 1762-1766.
12. Suarez-Castaneda E, Pezzoli L, Elas M, Baltrons R, Crespin-Elias EO, Pleitez OA, de Campos MI, Danovaro-Holliday MC. Routine childhood vaccination programme coverage, El Salvador, 2011-In search of timeliness. Vaccine. 2014:437-44.
13. Nguyen DT, Leung K, McIntyre L,  William AG, Sauve R. Does Integrated Management of Childhood Illness (IMCI) Training Improve the Skills of Health Workers? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS One. 2013; 8(6): e66030.Published online 2013 Jun. 12. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0066030.
14. Legesse E,  Dechasa W. An assessment of child immunization coverage and its determinants in Sinana District, Southeast Ethiopia. BMC Pediatric. 2014;15: 31.
15. Ahmad Shareeteh. Ahammiyat Barnamaj IMCI Fi Tasneef Al-Atfal Wa Mu’alajatuhum Min Umur Shahrain Hatta Umur Khams Sanawaat. Journal of Dumuscus University for Health Sciences 2013; 29(2):99-106.
16. El-Mahalli AA, Akl OA. Effect of adopting Integrated Management of Childhood Illness guidelines on drug use at a primary health care center: A case study from Egypt. Journal of Family and Community Medicine. 2011 ; 18:118-123.
17. Mona A.R, Ahmed-Nagaty M.A, Suzanne F, Sergio P, Simon C, Bernadette D, Rajiv B. Does implementation of the IMCI strategy have an impact on child mortality? A retrospective analysis of routine data from Egypt. BMJ Open. 2013;3.
18. Horwood C, Vermaak K, Rollins N, Haskins L, Nkosi P, et al. An evaluation of the quality of IMCI assessments among IMCI trained health workers in South Africa. PLoS One . 2009: 4(6): e5937.  
19. Armstrong J, Bryce J, de Savigny D, Lambrechts T, Mbuya C.  The effect of Integrated Management of Childhood Illness on observed quality of care of under-fives in rural Tanzania. Health Policy Plan. 2004. 19: 1-10.
20. Horwood C, Voce A, Vermaak K, Rollins N, Qazi S. Experiences of training and implementation of integrated management of childhood illness (IMCI) in South Africa: a qualitative evaluation of the IMCI case management training course. BMC Pediatrics. 2009. 9: 62.
21. Handbook  IMCI Integrated Management of Childhood Illness ISBN 92 4 154644 1 (NLM classification: WS 200) World Health Organization 2005. World Health Organization, Department of Child and Adolescent Health and Development (CAH), Avenue Appia 20, CH-1211 Geneva 27, Switzerland. Fax: +41 22 791 4853.