Document Type : Research Paper
Authors
1 Department of Medicine, College of Medicine, University of Mosul, Mosul
2 The Rheumatology Outpatient Clinic, Ibn Sena Teaching Hospital, Mosul, Iraq
Abstract
Background: Self-reported questionnaires have become popular measures in assessing disability in patients with low back pain (LBP). Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is one of the internationally accepted, self-reporting questionnaire which demonstrates good psychometric properties.
Objectives: The present study intended to evaluate a face to face interview applying Arabic version of the RMQ, and comparing it with a modified version of RMQ (RMQV), and whether the purely subjective RMQ scores correlate with symptoms and signs which have predictive or prognostic values.
Design: case-series study
Methods and materials: Case-series study conducted on seventy-two patients with chronic LBP at Ibn-Sina Teaching Hospital in Mosul city. Physical examination at rheumatology outpatient clinic performed for every patient, and the patients are allowed to answer the questions of RMQ through a direct investigator-patient Arabic conversation. The disability measured by the RMQ subdivided into: mild (0-8), moderate (9-16) and severe (17-24). An individualized literature review performed for clinical features which have predictive or prognostic values in LBP, and including these features in the clinical evaluation of patients in the current study.
Results: The results showed that the Arabic conversational RMQ have acceptable reliability and RMQV have excellent reliability (Cronbach’s alpha values=0.72 and 0.94 respectively). There was a significant direct correlation between these two questionnaires (r=0.861; p-value<0.001). However, we found a significant difference between them (p-value<0.01). The scores of the RMQ and RMQV correlate moderately with a score of the predictive features (r=0.503; p-value < 0.01 and 0.530; p-value Conclusion: The study found that the modified version (RMQV) has higher reliability than the original one. Also, the RMQV showed a better correlation with the narrow-angle straight leg raising test, and its mild and moderate subgroups have significant differences regarding the duration and pain intensity of the current episode of LBP. Other measured properties look similar between the two questionnaires.
Keywords
Main Subjects
INTRODUCTION
P |
ain at lower back is a common problem in everyday practice that reported by the majority of adults during their lifetime and is the most frequent cause of disability for individuals younger than 45 years. It is the third leading cause of disability for those older than 45 years. 1, 2
Acute LBP usually resolves spontaneously, but up to 10% progresses to chronic LBP resulting in temporary to permanent disability 3. Chronic nonspecific LBP and its resulting disability have become important epidemic health and a socioeconomic problem 4.
LBP remains the most important occupational health problem in industrialized countries, accounting for about 20% to 30% of workers' compensation claims and up to 50% of all direct compensation costs 5.
Disability encompasses impairments, limitations (on activity), and restrictions (to participation) that may occur in the presence of a health condition (disorder or disease)6. The LBP results in significant levels of disability, producing substantial restrictions on normal activities and participation, such as an inability to work 7. Also, the disability is considered as an excellent clinical assessment of severity in LBP 8. Several instruments or methods are used to measure disability in LBP. These measures improve our knowledge about the patient functions and the severity of his/her disorders and also can help in following the patient's course8,9. Self-reported questionnaires have become well-accepted measures in assessing disability in patients with LBP 10.
The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) has been frequently used to measure disability in patients with chronic LBP demonstrating good qualities11,12. The RMQ which is a self-reported instrument; its questions focus consistently on disabilities related to the back and the answers are dichotomous: yes/no13. The scores, therefore, range from zero (no disability) to 24 (maximum disability). The questionnaire can complete in a maximum of 5 min, and an un-weighted score can calculate in less than 1 min. No sub-scoring reported, and the administration is straightforward. The questions deal with body functions (pain, sleeping, and appetite) as well as activities (self-care, walking, sitting, standing, lifting, dressing, stairs climbing, housework and resting) 14.
The study aimed to evaluate the application of Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (RMQ) in its Arabic conversational version, look for correlations or disagreements between RMQ results and other clinical manifestations, particularly, features which can predict severity, and suggest modifications to improve the measurement.
METHODS
The protocol of this study was approved by the Scientific and regional research ethics committees at the College of Medicine in 2014 and by Directorate General of Neneveh Health Department. The study conducted at the rheumatology clinic of Ibn-Sina Teaching Hospital, Mosul, Iraq.
Study Design: Clinical case-series study.
Methods and materials: This study conducted on seventy-two patients after taking their consent to participate in the study with an age range between (18 – 60) years who suffered from low back pain (LBP) ± lumbar root symptoms for more than three months.
Exclusion criteria included: Suspicion of neoplastic or infective spinal conditions, compression fractures, chronic inflammatory joint/spinal diseases, organ failure (cardiovascular, respiratory, renal and hepatic), specific neurological problems (stroke, multiple sclerosis, peripheral neuropathy) and pregnancy.Materials included:Mechanical weight and height scale (Fazzini), tape measure, 128 Hz tuning fork, neurological (reflex) hammer, examination couch, plumb-bob (plummet), electronic stop-watch, and plastic goniometer.
Face to face interviews were performed for patients participated in the study. Demographic, clinical, and other relevant data obtained. The focusing was mainly on the crucial features that have predictive values and included the following:
Buttock pain, below knee pain, the sitting difficulty, Stress pain15-21, a history of sciatica longer than three months, decreased lumbar lordosis, painful side bending 22,23,24 as well as painful forward flexion, positive quadrant test, extension test, neurological deficit of the legs (decreased sensation & /or power & /or reflexes), decreased vibration sense at the big toe,scoliosis, limited forward flexion, and limited lateral bending. 25-29
The pain intensity of the initial episode measured retrospectively on global visual analog scale (VAS) of (0 – 100) divisions where zero means no pain and 100 means the worst pain, then; this pain intensity subdivided into three subgroups: mild (0-33), moderate (34-66) and severe (67-100). Pain intensity of the current episode is also measured on VAS and also divided into three subgroups: mild (0-33), moderate (34-66) and severe (67-100).
The presence of scoliosis was assessed by using plumb-bob with the tip of the string placed at the spinous process of the first thoracic vertebra and the weight allowed to hang down to reach the buttock of the patient, if any deviation of the weight from the mid-gluteal cleft observed then the patient reported as having scoliosis 30.
Flexion of the spine was evaluated by Schober's test 31. Any increase in the distance of less than 5 cm considers abnormal. The lateral flexion was assessed using a finger to fibula test, in which the patient asked to bend to one side as much as he can (without any bending forward). The test is considering abnormal if the distance between the tip of the third finger and the head of the fibula was more than 5 cm, then the test repeated on the other side 32. The extension test is done by asking the patient to actively extend his back as far as tolerated with the examiner providing support for balance, the position held for 30 seconds and the test considered positive if the patient reports pain in the low back area or the lower limb24. While in the quadrant test the patient actively moves into lateral bending, extension, and rotation to the same side as far as tolerated, the examiner guides the patient in this motion and provides overpressure if no pain is reported with this movement.
The test considered positive if the patient reports pain or numbness in the area of the back or lower extremities 25.
The angle of the SLR test was measured for each patient by the plastic goniometer and subdivided into 3 subgroups: patients with narrow -angle SLR (0-45 degree), patients with wide angle SLR (46-70 degree) and patients with negative SLR (more than 70 degree).
Vibration sense as part of the neurological examination for both lower limbs was assessed using a 128 Hz tuning fork on the medial malleolus and the big toe.
Following a physical examination, the process of answering the twenty-four questions of the Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) was started. Because the level of illiteracy in our community is relatively high, a direct, conversational method was chosen. In this method, the questions of RMQ have answered through face to face investigator-patient Arabic conversation. The disability measured by the RMQ subdivided into mild (0-8), moderate (9-16) and severe (17-24).
After filling the RMQ in its original form, another investigator-patient Arabic conversation started to answer the questions of RMQ in a modified method (RMQV). In this method the answer for each item is obtained on a global visual analogue scales (VAS) of zero to 100 subdivisions. The patient was asked to determine how much his/her various activities (daily living, duties, recreation, and vitality feeling) were affected by each particular question due to the LBP, with zero means no any effect on these activities while 100 indicates the worst outcome that the patient can think of. The disability measured by the RMQV also subdivided into three subgroups: mild (0-30), moderate (31-60) and severe (61-100).
RESULTS
Seventy-two patients with the history of chronic LBP for more than three months duration participated in this study. Male to female percentage was 41.7: 58.3. As shown in the Table 1, the mean age and BMI of the studied group were 37.23 ±9.14 and 29.3± 4.46 respectively.
Table 2 demonstrates the mean duration of LBP (50.31±52.42 months), initial episode duration (in days), and the initial episode duration (29.16 ±37.23 days).
Table 1: Demographic features of the patients.
Demographic features (No.= 72) |
|
Gender Male Female |
30 (41.7%) 42 (58.3%) |
Age: range/Mean/ (±SD) years |
19 - 60/37.23 (±9.14) |
BMI: range/Mean (±SD) |
20.9 – 42.91/29.3 (±4.46) |
Table 2: Different duration categories of LBP and number of the prior episodes.
Categories |
Mean (±SD) |
Categories |
Mean (±SD) |
LBP duration in months |
50.31 (±52.42) |
Current episode duration in days |
22.26 (±22.49) |
Initial episode duration in days |
29.16 (±37.23) |
No. of prior episodes of LBP |
11.52 (±11.69) |
SD = Standard deviation
Table 3 shows the range and mean of the pain intensity for the initial episode of LBP measured on VAS retrospectively and current episodes of LBP measured on VAS. Also range and mean for both RMQ and RMQV are shown.
Table 4 shows the different subgroups of LBP. In RMQ, we can see that the highest percentage of patients (48.6%) lie within the moderate subgroup followed by the severe subgroup (26.4%) and the lowest percentage for the mild subgroup (25%). In contrast, the distribution of patients within the severity subgroups of RMQV is clearly different, most of the patients lie within the mild subgroup (76.4%), a small number of patients within the moderate subgroup (19.4%) and only few number of patients lie within the severe subgroup (4.2%).
Some of the important clinical features of the patients are shown in the Table 5, including the number and percentage of patients having each particular feature. These clinical features were chosen because they have predictive values.
Table 3: Total pain intensity of initial and current episodes and disability scores.
Pain intensity of the initial episode measured on VAS: range/mean(±SD) |
10 - 100 / 71.52 (±23.05) |
Pain intensity of the current episode measured on VAS: range/mean(±SD) |
20 - 100 / 59.58 (±15.42) |
RMQ score: range/mean (±SD) |
2 - 22 / 12.38 (±5.47) |
RMQV score: range/mean (±SD) |
0 - 66.67 / 21.71 (±17.26) |
Table 4: Severity subgroups of LBP.
Severity subgroups |
No. of patients (%) |
|
Pain intensity of first episode measured by VAS |
Mild |
4/72(5.6) |
Moderate |
20/72 (27.8) |
|
Severe |
48/72 (66.7) |
|
Pain intensity of current episode measured by VAS |
Mild |
1/72 (1.4) |
Moderate |
53/72 (73.6) |
|
Severe |
18/72 (25) |
|
SLR test subgroups |
Narrow angle |
15/72 (20.8) |
Wide angle |
23/72 (31.9) |
|
Negative test |
34/72 (47.2) |
|
RMQ subgroups |
Mild |
18/72 (25) |
Moderate |
35/72 (48.6) |
|
severe |
19/72 (26.4) |
|
RMQV subgroups |
Mild |
55/72 (76.4) |
Moderate |
14/72 (19.4) |
|
severe |
3/72 (4.2) |
VAS = Visual Analogue Scale.
Table 5: Some of the essential clinical features of the patients.
Features |
No. of patients (%) |
Features |
No. of patients (%) |
|
Pain site |
Lumbar pain |
72 / 72 (100) |
Painful forward flexion |
47 / 72 (65.3) |
Gluteal pain |
33 / 72 (45.8) |
Limited lateral bending |
10 / 72 (13.9) |
|
Below knee pain |
29 / 72 (40.3) |
Painful lateral bending |
41 / 72 (56.9) |
|
Stress pain |
34 / 72 (47.2) |
Positive extension test |
45 / 72 (62.5) |
|
Difficulty in sitting |
49 / 72 (68.1) |
Positive quadrant test |
49 / 72 (68.1) |
|
History of sciatica > 3 months |
9 / 72 (12.5) |
Positive SLR |
38 / 72 (52.8) |
|
Scoliosis |
9 / 72 (12.5) |
Neurological deficit of leg |
35 / 72 (48.6) |
|
Decreased lordosis |
7 / 72 (9.7) |
Decreased big toe vibration |
19 / 72 (26.4) |
|
Limited forward flexion |
9 / 72 (12.5) |
|
|
The total number of positive clinical features with predictive values (16 features) for each patient was estimated and, the resulting total score of these predictive features (which ranged from 0-16) was compared with that of the RMQ and RMQV separately. The range and mean of this predictive features-score were (0-15) and 6.43±2.83 respectively. Table 6 shows the correlation between the predictive features score and each of RMQ and RMQV.
Table 7 compares between the means for RMQ and RMQV questionnaires according to Pearson correlation coefficient and independent samples t-test. Both of them were significant.
Table 8 shows the proportions of patients for each particular clinical feature within the severity subgroups of the RMQV. The comparison between the percentages of patients having each particular clinical feature within the mild and moderate subgroups of the RMQV has been studied using the two-proportion test. If the number of patients for a specific clinical feature was zero in the mild and/or the moderate subgroups, then the percentage of patients for this feature is not compared. Statistical analysis of the severe subset of the RMQV was omitted because of the small number of patients in this subgroup (3 patients only).
Table 6: Correlation (Pearson’s coefficient r) between predictive features score and the disability scores (RMQV and RMQ).
Predictive features score |
Pearson’s coefficient ( r ) |
|
RMQV |
RMQ |
|
0.530 |
0.503 |
|
P-value |
< 0.01 |
< 0.01 |
Table 7: The Cronbach’s alpha, Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) and comparison between the means for both RMQ and RMQV.
Disability score |
Independent samples t-test |
Pearson's correlation coefficient (r) |
Cronbach’s alpha |
RMQ |
P < 0.01 |
0.861 (P < 0.001) |
0.72 (acceptable reliability) |
RMQV |
0.94 (excellent reliability) |
Table 8: Numbers and percentages of patients having some particular clinical features within RMQV subgroups.
Clinical features |
Mild 55/72 (%) |
Moderate 14/72 (%) |
p-value |
|
Pain intensity of the current episode |
Mild
Moderate
Severe |
1 (1.8)
47 (85.5)
7 (12.7) |
0
6 (42.9)
8 (57.1) |
NC
0.002
0.001 |
Buttock pain |
21 (38.2) |
9 (64.3) |
NS |
|
Below knee pain |
22 (40) |
5 (35.7) |
NS |
|
Stress pain |
19 (34.5) |
12 (85.7) |
<0.001 |
|
Difficulty in sitting |
36 (65.5) |
10 (71.4) |
NS |
|
Prior sciatica > 3 months |
7 (12.7) |
1 (7.1) |
NS |
|
Scoliotic posture |
5 (9.1) |
2 (14.3) |
NS |
|
Decreased lordosis |
4 (7.3) |
2 (14.3) |
NS |
|
Limited forward flexion |
4 (7.3) |
3 (21.4) |
NS |
|
Painful forward flexion |
34 (61.8) |
11 (78.6) |
NS |
|
Limited lateral bending |
6 (10.9) |
1 (7.1) |
NS |
|
Painful lateral bending |
27 (49.1) |
11 (78.6) |
0.022 |
|
Positive quadrant test |
36 (65.5) |
10 (71.4) |
NS |
|
Positive extension test |
33 (60) |
10 (71.4) |
NS |
|
Positive SLR |
26 (47.3) |
10 (71.4) |
NS |
|
Neurological deficit of leg |
24 (43.6) |
8 (57.1) |
NS |
|
Decreased big toe vibration |
13 (23.6) |
4 (28.6) |
NS |
|
NC = No comparison has been done; NS = Not significant (p >0.05) according to two-proportion z-test.
Table 9 shows the proportions of patients for each particular clinical feature within the severity subgroups of the RMQ. The comparisons between the percentages of patients having each particular clinical feature within the mild and moderate subgroups of the RMQ have been studied using the two-proportions z-test. If the number of patients for a particular clinical feature was found to be zero in the mild and/or the moderate subgroups, then the percentage of patients for that feature has not been compared. A comparison with the severe subgroup was not performed as it has not been performed in that of the RMQV one (the preceding table).
Table 10 shows the different duration categories of LBP for each severity subgroup of the RMQV and RMQ. Statistical analysis between the severe subgroups of the RMQ and RMQV was omitted because of the small number of patients in the severe subgroup of RMQV (3 patients only).
Table 9: Numbers and percentages of patients having some particular clinical features within RMQ subgroups.
Clinical features |
Mild 18/72 (%) |
Moderate 35/72 (%) |
p-value |
|
Pain intensity of the current episode |
Mild Moderate Severe |
1 (5.6) 17 (94.4) 0 |
0 29 (82.9) 6 (17.1) |
NC NS NC |
Buttock pain |
5 (27.8) |
16 (45.7) |
NS |
|
Below knee pain |
7 (38.9) |
14 (40) |
NS |
|
Stress pain |
3 (16.7) |
15 (42.9) |
0.031 |
|
Difficulties in sitting |
9 (50) |
24 (68.6) |
NS |
|
Prior sciatica > 3 months |
1 (5.6) |
5 (14.3) |
NS |
|
Scoliotic posture |
1(5.6) |
5(14.3) |
NS |
|
Decreased lordosis |
1(5.6) |
2(5.7) |
NS |
|
Limited forward flexion |
3(16.7) |
1(2.9) |
NS |
|
Painful forward flexion |
11(61.1) |
21(60) |
NS |
|
Limited lateral bending |
1(5.6) |
4(11.4) |
NS |
|
Painful lateral bending |
4(22.2) |
21(60) |
0.003 |
|
Positive quadrant test |
9(50) |
24(68.6) |
NS |
|
Positive extension test |
8(44.4) |
22(62.8) |
NS |
|
Positive SLR |
9(50) |
16(45.7) |
NS |
|
Neurological deficit of leg |
5(27.8) |
16(45.7) |
NS |
|
Decreased big toe vibration |
3(16.7) |
10(28.6) |
NS |
|
NC = No comparison has been done; NS = Not significant test (p >0.05). According to two-proportions z-test.
Table 11 shows the correlations between the severity subgroups of both (RMQ and RMQV) and the pain intensity of the current episode of LBP (Pearson’s correlation), and between the severity subgroups of both RMQ and RMQV, and the SLR test subgroups (Spearman’s rank correlation).
Table 10: Different duration categories for each severity subgroups of RMQ & RMQV.
Severity subgroups |
Duration since onset in months: mean (±SD) |
Initial episode duration in days: mean (±SD) |
Current episode duration in days: mean (±SD) |
|||
Mild RMQV |
49.34 (±53.01) |
NS |
24.58 (±28.41) |
NS |
18.56 (±18.2) |
S** |
Moderate RMQV |
44.35 (±41.57) |
34.28 (±25.3) |
39.78 (±30.8) |
|||
Mild RMQ |
44.94 (±63.38) |
NS |
30.94 (±41.05) |
NS |
17.88 (±16.82) |
NS |
Moderate RMQ |
51.34 (±49.1) |
18.94 (±16.79) |
15.97 (±15.28) |
|||
Severe RMQ |
53.52 (±49.5) |
46.31 (±53.18) |
38 (±30.47) |
S** = significant difference at p-value <0.01; NS = not significant (using independent samples t-test (>0.05).
Table 11: Correlations between subgroups of pain intensity and SLR test with that of RMQV and RMQ.
Features |
RMQV subgroups |
RMQ subgroups |
Pain intensity subgroups |
0.634** (r) |
0.625** (r) |
SLR degree subgroups |
0.262* (rho) |
0.154 (rho) |
* = P-value
rho = Spearman’s rank correlation coefficient.
DISCUSSION
The self-reported questionnaires of disability are of great relevance in assessing the severity of low back pain (LBP). The Roland-Morris Questionnaire (RMQ) is considered one of the most commonly studied self-reported disability measures 8, 33. This questionnaire is considered thoroughly validated, have acceptable reliability and is recommended and referred to as a tool of choice in the assessment of the severity of disability caused by LBP 34.Also, it is quickly completed, easy to be understood and scored, and broadly consistent with the WHO ICF definition of activity limitation.
But among the weakening points of this questionnaire are: being purely subjective and lack any physical signs, dichotomous responses only with no ability to rate the degree of limitation for a given functional activity, providing equal marks to mild and severe symptoms, patients rate limitation just in last 24 hours, depends mainly on daily living activities rather than duties and work activities (such as lifting, carrying, pushing or pulling objects) 35, 36. Moreover, the high levels of illiteracy in many countries make the completion of such self-reported questionnaire by the patient alone very difficult. Therefore in this study, an Arabic conversational version of the RMQ was chosen, which has been adapted in the rheumatology unit of Ibn-Sina teaching hospital.
The mean age of seventy-two participated patients was 37.23 years, and this is within the range of age considered to have the highest frequency of LBP 37. Their mean BMI was also high (29.3 kg/m2) and the high BMI is considered as a risk factor for chronicization of acute and subacute LBP 20. The mean duration of LBP since its initial onset was 50.31 months and the mean duration of the initial episode of LBP was 29.16 days; whereas the mean duration of the current episode of LBP was 22.26 days. All the patients were having a history of more than one previous episode of LBP with the mean number equal to 11.52 episodes.
The mean intensity of the pain for initial episodes measured on global VAS scale (0-100 scores) was (71.52/out of 100 scores) and, there were 4 patients (5.6%) having mild pain, 20 patients (27.8%) having moderate pain and, 48 patients (66.7%) having severe pain. The mean intensity of the current episode pain which also measured on global VAS scale was 59.58 and, there was only one patient (1.4%) having mild pain, 53 patients (73.6%) having moderate pain and 18 patients (25%) having severe pain. The range and mean for RMQ were 2- 22 and 12.38 respectively; and there were 18 patients (25%) lie within its mild subgroup, 35 patient (48.6%) within its moderate subgroup, and nineteen patients (26.4%) within the severe subgroup. While for RMQV the range and mean were 0 - 66.67 and 21.71 respectively; and there were 55 patients (76.4%) lie within its mild subgroup, 14 patients (19.4%) within its moderate subgroup, and only 3 patients (4.2%) within the severe subgroups. The mean scores for the RMQ reflect a moderate level of disability while that for the RMQV reflect a mild degree of disability.
It appears that the differences in the distribution of patients within the severity subgroups of RMQ and RMQV are remarkable. Most patients lie within the mild subgroup of the RMQV and a minimal number within the severe one, while most of the patients lie in the moderate subgroup of RMQ followed by the severe, then the mild ones. These may indicate that a high percentage of the patients who considered to have moderate or severe disabilities according to the RMQ was really only mildly disabled according to the RMQV. Therefore these two questionnaires are different from each other, and this difference was confirmed by comparing the means for both questionnaires using independent samples t-test which showed a significant difference between them (p-value< 0.01). Yet they were found to have a strong direct correlation with each other (r=0.861; p-value< 0.001). The reliability for the Arabic conversational version of the RMQ was estimated using Cronbach’s alpha, and it was 0.73, and for the RMQV the reliability was higher (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.94).
What we call them predictive features are actually predict various aspects in LBP, like unresponsiveness to physical medicine modalities 17,18,38,chronicity19,20,23, poor or unfavorable outcome 21,24,25,28, severity 26,29,30, and the presence of underlying nerve root compression or disc protrusion22,32.
Collectively, these predictive features have an impact on the management of patients with LBP.
A set of clinical features (16 features) with predictive and prognostic values was used for comparison with both RMQ & RMQV separately. The total numbers of positive predictive features were estimated for each patient, and the final score was used to compare it with that of RMQ and RMQV for the same patient.
The correlation between these predictive features score and each of the RMQ and RMQV were found to be moderate and significant (r=0.503, p-value < 0.01 and r=0.530, p-value < 0.01 respectively). The number and percentages of patients having each particular clinical feature in each severity subgroup of the RMQ and RMQV were estimated. The two-proportion test was used to compare the percentages of patients having each of these clinical features in the mild subgroup and those having the same clinical features in the moderate subgroup of the RMQV. The same comparisons also performed for the patients within the mild and moderate subgroups of the RMQ. The results revealed that there were significant differences between the mild and moderate subgroups of RMQV in the frequency of stress pain and painful lateral bending (p-value
The mean duration of LBP since its onset was found to be longer in the mild subgroup (49.34 months) than the moderate subgroup (44.35 months) of the RMQV, while it was longer in the moderate (51.34 months) than the mild subgroups (44.94 months) of the RMQ. The mean duration of the initial episodes was found to be longer in the moderate subgroup (34.28 days) than in the mild one (24.58 days) in the RMQV, while it was longer in the mild (30.94 days) than the moderate subgroups (18.94 days) of the RMQ. In case of the current episode, its mean duration was found to be longer in the moderate subgroups (39.78 days) than in the mild one (18.56 days). Also, its mean duration was longer in the mild (17.88 days) than the moderate subgroups (15.97 days) of the RMQ. These differences in the duration categories were found to be significant only for the mean duration of the current episode of LBP between the severity subgroups of RMQV with p-value < 0.01 (using independent samples t-test).
Furthermore, the intensity of the LBP was found to have strong correlations with RMQ and RMQV (r=0.625 at p-value < 0.01 and r=0.634 at p-value < 0.01 respectively). The pain intensity of the LBP considered having predictive values such as being a predictor of short-term outcome after lumbar discectomy 39, also it is considered to be correlated with greater disability in patients with lumbar spinal stenosis 40.
A narrow angle SLR test also has predictive values such as being a predictor of poor outcome after lumbar disc herniation surgery 41. Spearman’s rank correlation was used to compare the severity subgroups of both the RMQ and RMQV with the SLR test subgroups, a significant moderate correlation was found between the SLR test subgroups and the RMQV subgroups (rho= 0.262 at p-value<0.05), whereas the relationship between the SLR test subgroups and the RMQ subgroups was weak and not significant (rho = 0.154).
CONCLUSIONS
Arabic translation and face to face interview instead of the original patient report can maintain the excellent internal consistency of the questionnaires.
The differences between the original RMQ and the VAS-graded modification (RMQV) are prominent in that the RMQV have better reliability, better correlation with the narrow-angle straight leg raising test, and its mild and moderate subgroups have significant differences regarding the duration and pain intensity of the current episode of low back pain.
The scores of the two versions RMQ correlated somewhat moderately with the predictive and prognostic clinical feature.